Required elements of a Network Membership Proposal

Proposals may be submitted by Deans, Department Chairs or Senior Faculty members (Tenured Professors or equivalent) and must contain a letter of support from the institution’s administration (Dean, Provost, President) indicating their commitment to enhancing biomedical research on their campus. Each PUI may only submit one network membership proposal.

1. FORMAT. Proposals should be no more than 10 pages (not including forms); single spaced, font Arial or equivalent, font size no smaller than 11, with margins no smaller than 0.6” on all sides. PHS398 form packet face page, budget, budget justification, facilities and equipment should be used. The new biosketch form should be used for the PI and co-PI (if applicable) only, do not provide biosketches for all faculty participants. Appendices are allowed, but should only include the institutional letter of support, other letters of support (if necessary), and Alterations and Renovations funding (if requested, see below).

2. PROGRESS REPORT (for current network members only – 2 page limit, not included as part of 10 page overall proposal page limit). Describe the progress your institution has made regarding the goals indicated in your SC INBRE IV application. Include information on faculty productivity (publications, presentations, grants) and development (promotion/tenure), diversity initiatives, student training activities, and student outcomes. Succinct tables are recommended.

3. PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT of Biomedical Research Capacity and Student Training. This section should describe the current biomedical research training environment and how participation in SC INBRE V will strengthen/enhance the current research culture. The description should address the following
   
   a. Indicate the departments/programs that will participate in INBRE funded research, the pool of faculty that will participate in student training and number of potential faculty who could apply for SC INBRE DRP program grants. Provide information on faculty productivity as well as plans for faculty development as part of SC INBRE which should include facilitating faculty applications to DRP program grants and mentoring through the T&P process
   
   b. Number of students enrolled in these departments/programs, student demographics, number of current students participating in research activities, and outcomes for recent graduates
   
   c. Detailed plan describing how the new phase of SC INBRE will build (for new institutions) or expand upon/improve current programs (for current institutions) in relation to goals for student training. Indicate current biomedical research focus areas at the institution and any plans to expand into new research areas using SC INBRE support.
   
   d. Indicate planned inter-institutional interactions for research training of students, and if/how these activities will be expanded under SC INBRE
   
   e. Indicate the status of institutional research support infrastructure (i.e. is there accounting and grant management assistance, an Office of Sponsored Programs, IRB, IACUC, Biosafety committees in place) and how necessary infrastructure would be built or expanded to manage and serve the needs of an expanded biomedical research program. Applicants can allocate up to 15% of their requested budget (direct costs) for administrative costs, including support to develop/strengthen their Office of Sponsored Programs. The reviewers of the proposals will need assurance that the institutions are committed to put in place the necessary infrastructure, if it is not already there, so the research program will be successful.
   
   

4. PLAN FOR ENHANCING DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES. Including diverse perspectives and experiences in the research training environment allows individuals from different communities to participate in and derive benefit from scientific advances. In this section, indicate how your institution plans to promotes diverse perspectives in biomedical research. Include a timeline for achieving your goals for this area and milestones for determining progress. Examples may include, but are not limited to:
   
   a. Collaborations among network institutions or engagement of different organizations in the state
   
   b. Participation of individuals from diverse backgrounds, including those from groups traditionally underrepresented in the biomedical workforce
   
   c. Outreach and activities designed to recruit women and underrepresented groups, both at the student and faculty level
   
   

5. ALTERATION AND RENOVATION (optional; up to 2 pages). As part of the renewal, SC INBRE V can make a one-time request (up to $250,000) for funds to support alterations and/or renovations of research space. Requested funds must be expended in the first year of SC INBRE V. Only PUIs are eligible to request A&R funds. A&R requests will be evaluated separately from institutional proposals and will not be part of the overall evaluation of an institution as a potential network member. In other words, a proposal may be accepted but the A&R request denied, and in exceptional cases, funds may be devoted to A&R at an institution that may not become a full member. Should a project be selected for funding, applicants will be required to provide line drawings of the proposed renovations. Funds cannot be requested for new construction (including outfitting of shell space) or purchase of movable equipment. This section must address the following:
   
   a. Describe the proposed renovation project and provide simple drawings/diagrams so the scope of the project can be discerned
   
   b. Indicate how the proposed renovations will improve research infrastructure/capacity and support student training
   
   c. If renovations to animal facilities are proposed, include how the renovation will comply with relevant laws/policies/guidelines. The role and composition of the IACUC must be provided as well as reporting lines and administrative authority and oversight of the institutional animal program
   
   

6. INSTITUTIONAL COMMITMENT to participating in SC INBRE. Evidence of commitment to enhance biomedical research, promote faculty development and build a sustainable biomedical research program should include plans to leverage support provided by SC INBRE to enhance the overall campus research culture. Information provided should include:
   
   a. Indicate the senior institutional leader (President/Vice President for Research or equivalent) who will serve on the Steering Committee
   
   b. Indicate the institutional lead who will serve on the Executive Committee
   
   c. Description of current institutional investment in biomedical research
   
   d. Plans for increasing biomedical research capacity on campus which may include, but is not limited to, new faculty hires, renovation of research space, equipment purchases, or initiatives to enhance biomedical research
   
   e. Letter of institutional support from a senior official indicating the institution’s commitment to support student and faculty participation in SC INBRE activities. This letter must include the required faculty release time noted above, as well as other plans to support the local INBRE program (i.e. Return of IDCs, dedicated funds to support additional students, travel support for students/faculty to attend scientific meetings, space, equipment, etc.)